British Under 15 Championship on
a slippery slope?
“Only the individual efforts of
youth conscious promoters has natured young talent but now the BSPA have
taken a major step in establishing the first British Under 15 Championship… It
is hoped that it will be used as a platform to discover young talent…. More
than two dozen riders applied to complete”
These were the words of the newly appointed British Under 21 team manager, Peter Oakes, in the Armadale programme on the 3rd May 2004 on the occasion of
the first round of the 2004 British Under 15 championship. Some 4 years later
is it time to examine if the high hopes expressed by Mr Oakes for the
championship has borne fruit.
After the Armadale round a
further 5 rounds were staged using the traditional 16 rider 20 heat individual
meeting format with championship points being awarded depending on a riders
finishing position, ending at Carmarthen on 19th September. The overall
championship was based on a riders best 3 scores to
take account of the fact that due to time and financial restraints not all
riders would be able to take part in all the rounds. Josh Auty
had the honour of becoming the first holder of the title but more importantly
over 25 riders took part in the championship.
After this successful first staging of the
championship in the following year it was extended to 7 rounds, which were
staged from 1st May to 10th August, which once again used the traditional 16
rider 20 heat race format but now the best 4 scores
decided the overall championship. Josh Auty retained
his title but other riders who had their first public rides
included Ben Taylor, Joe Haines and Ben Hopwood.
Rather than progressing from these two successful stagings the championship now begin its slow decline. In
2006 the number of rounds staged between 18th June and 7th October was reduced
to 6 and more worrying the traditional 16 rider 20 heat race format was dropped
in favour of a format involving 12 riders in 12 qualifying heats with the top 9
scorers progressing to quarter and semi finals and a grand final with points
being awarded based on a riders finishing position. At some rounds up to 15
riders were programmed to ride and so on these occasions 11 riders were seeded
direct to the qualifying heats and the other riders had a race off with the
winner becoming the 12th seeded rider and the others becoming the meeting
reserves. At other rounds there were only 12 riders with no reserves and so if
a rider withdrew during the course of the meeting you had races with only 3 or
sometimes 2 riders. At the end of the qualifying heats the 3 lowest scoring
riders were eliminated with the riders finishing in 9th to 6th positions riding
in the quarter final. The winner of this race joined the riders finishing in
5th to 3rd positions in the semi final. The first two finishers in this race
joined the top two scorers in the grand final. Or in simple terms we had 12
heats to decide which 9 riders would progress to the final three heats.
Once again the best 4 scores decided the overall
championship with Joe Haines, the runner up in 2005, became the champion with
Ben Hopwood a close runner up.
It is not clear why the new race format was chosen.
Was it just to a shortage of riders, a worrying sign in only the championships
third staging and if so a worrying sign for the future of the sport, or because
the powers that be had decided to go for quality rather than quantity.
Whatever the reason the format
was retained in 2007 but the decline of the championship now when into
overdrive. There was a deafening quiet throughout the winter
and the first news of the championship appeared in the Speedway Star of 5th May
when it was announced that a 250cc championship would be run along side the
500cc championship with the winner receiving a new 250cc bike from JRM (formerly
Jawa) and more worryingly the comment “ the format of this year’s championship is still on the
drawing board but hopefully full details will be announced within the next
couple of weeks.”
In the good years the championship was up and
running at this stage of the season but in 2007 riders and more importantly
parents did not know when the championship would start, how many rounds would
be involved, where and when the rounds would be staged. Remember speedway is a
professional sport run by professional people.
From postings on the British Speedway Forum (BSF) it
appeared that the first round of the 2007 championship was scheduled for
The Northside training
track at Workington staged the second round of the championship on 23rd
September. Interestingly at the Northside round 12
riders were seeded to the qualifying heats and 4 riders were programmed to race
off to decide who would be the meeting reserves, although only 3 turned up on
the day. Two other races were programmed for the results so in fact 18 heats
were programmed to feature the 12 seeded riders and the reserves so one is
bound to ask why it was not possible to run the meeting on the more traditional
16 rider 20 heat format after the final round at
Why did the 2007 championship not start until 1st
September after with a major slip up with the planned starting date which
itself was very late compared to previous years and why only 3 rounds.
The
One posting claimed that the BSPA only send out an
email to tracks asking them if they wished to stage an round of the
championship on 12th July whilst another claimed that riders weren’t given
details of the championship until 23rd July remember that the first round of
the championship was scheduled for Weymouth on 4th August. If the postings are
a true and accurate then the stated reason why the championship start was
delayed doesn’t appear to hold water.
Another concern is the gradual decrease in the
number of rounds each year and more worrying for the future of the sport the
fact that rather than the number of riders wishing to take part increasing year
on year as the championship becomes established the opposite seems to be
happening. Could this fall in numbers be because parents who after all finance
the riders and ferrying them around the country have become disillusioned with
the way the championship is run. After all in 2007 they did not know until the
very last minute when how many and when rounds would be held a situation that
would have been a disgrace to a pub darts league never mind a championship associated
with a so called professional sport and it is little wonder that some may see a
brighter future in their kids taking part in motor sports, where they get
regular rides, such as grasstrack and MotoX.
Judging by postings on the BSF I am not alone in my
concerns, as one poster said “Is it not time for a change before speedway in
this country becomes defunct through lack of youngsters coming into the sport
and more importantly sticking at it
please BSPA/SCB open your eyes to what is happening in the real world”
In 2008 will the number of rounds, their dates and
venues be announced before the season starts or at the very least within the
first month or will the mistakes of 2007 be repeated as the championship slides
into oblivion.
If people are wondering what happen to the planned
250cc championship the Star dated 1st September claimed that it was cancelled
due to a lack of entrants. Postings on the BSF appear to suggest otherwise.
Rumours appeared that suggested that the powers that be were claiming that
riders were boycotting the series a claim denied by some parents who saying
that after spending over £3000 on engines and rolling chassis it would be crazy
to not run in the championship and the problem laid in the fact that no one had
been asked about the championship until the very last minute. In fact some
parents so wanted their sons to get rides that they organised they own mini
league meetings at various tracks as second half attractions. Hardly the actions of people boycotting a national championship.
Just being a speedway fan I doubt if any one at Wood
Street Rugby will take any notice but may I suggest that in 2008 the BSPA
ensure that whoever is in overall charge of the championship that this is their
only job in the sport. Some of the problems in 2007 appeared to be due to the
fact that the person in charge, no matter how good he was, had other
responsibilities within the sport as well as normal paid employment and at
times the championship appeared to be at the bottom of his list of priorities.
Maybe if this suggestion was followed then the championship could return to the
good days of 2004 and 2005 and become a major part of an organised and
well-managed route into the sport for young riders. The BSPA can talk the talk
about wanting to see more young British riders entering the sport and
progressing through the leagues but when it comes to walking the walk they
appeared to be handicapped.
S.Bear